Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. 19-03-2013  #1

    Artist

    Credits
    13
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Venezuela
    Posts
    10
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts

    Post Digital vs. analog audio: Which sounds better?

    The analog vs. digital debate has been raging for nearly three decades, and there's still no clear winner, because it's really just a matter of personal preference. I'm fine with that, but there's a lot of sniping in the analog/digital wars, and each side never misses an opportunity to put down the other side as misguided, deaf, just plain stupid, or worse. Each side claims its chosen format is superior and the opposite's is garbage.

    I'm an analog guy, but I'd admit that analog's distortions, speed variations, and noise/hiss make it less by-the-numbers accurate, but digital sound can be cold, hard, and uninviting. So on one hand you might say analog's distortions are part of its appeal, but if that was all there was to it, why do so many analog lovers like higher-resolution (96-kHz/24-bit or SACD) digital, more than CD-quality digital? I think high-resolution digital goes a long way toward eliminating most of the problems I hear with CDs. It's just that there's very, very little newly released high-resolution digital music to choose from (most SACD and DVD-A titles are back-catalog releases).

    The "loudness wars" and overprocessed sound common are rampant in digital audio formats, and that muddies the debate. "Bad" sound isn't inherent to digital, but there's a lot of pretty awful-sounding digitally recorded music out there. Better-sounding CD players and digital-to-analog converters can help improve the sound of CDs and digital files to some degree.

    LPs have problems, too. While we have vastly better vinyl pressings from companies like Mobile Fidelity that reduce the noise, clicks, and pops associated with LP playback, a lot of LPs are noisy, warped, and have distorted sound. Like the best high-resolution digital titles, the number of high-quality vinyl titles on the market are more limited, and most of the better-sounding, all-analog recordings come from the back-catalog vaults of the record labels. New music on an LP can be great, but again, if the recording is overprocessed, pressing it on vinyl doesn't make it sound any better. Most new music LPs are sourced from digital masters; there are very few, new all-analog LPs to choose from.

    Peaceful coexistence between the analog and digital faithful is the only way forward, and each side should enjoy music in its own way.

  2. 11-04-2013  #2

    Artist

    Credits
    23
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Gijon
    Posts
    8
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    I think that analog sound is better. For example,i have a minibrute and its sound incredible!!! But...vst's doesnt the same jejeje sorry for my english im spanish!

  3. 12-04-2013  #3

    Artist

    Credits
    6
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Cape Town, South Africa
    Posts
    16
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Great thread. Fully respect the Analog lovers and all but i do believe it's a question as vague as which DAW is the best.
    Always the same answer DAW doesn't matter it's how you use it. With that said, my two cents as far as Analog vs. Digital. I used analog and i'm using digital now. I find analog as warm and big sound with no doubt, but digital gives me so much more control and things to do. For example, try mimicking Dance floor standard FX techniques like all the ones you can get in D-Blue glitch in a analog realm. Not impossible, but a lot more effort. My example may count as invalid which is fine. Point still comes back to do you create easier music with Analog or Digital. Which one works faster, which can you afford and so on.

    For example in DJ'ing. I can play a set on Cdjs and a fairly okay sets on vinyl but give me Digital (Software) products and i can make new stuff on the spot.

    In the end, I'd like to mix both. The ease of digital with the character of Analog and that i believe, can be achieved by running your unmastered track through a Analog mastering process. Run it through a SSL or Mackie desk into some outboard gear to just brighten it up. Which still can all be done Digitally with a lot of years of experience.

    That's just my two cents. Great topic Subzeroxor

  4. 13-04-2013  #4

    Mega Producer

    Credits
    1178
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    271
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    1
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    401
    Thanked in
    101 Posts
    It's horses for courses really! Generally, a track that has been mixed and mastered for vinyl would sound better on vinyl than CD etc, but it's also personal taste.

    Also, you could have at least reworded the question rather than directly copying it from here: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13645_3-20055650-47.html

  5. 11-10-2013  #5

    Superstar DJ

    Credits
    2598
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    605
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    10
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    181
    Thanked in
    66 Posts
    like stated earlier , it's a personal preference , but i prefer warmer analog to cold crisp digital.. in certain situations.

  6. 15-12-2013  #6

    Executive Producer

    Credits
    4068
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Discord burntscarr#0420
    Posts
    1,202
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    241
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1,664
    Thanked in
    186 Posts
    I have been mixing with both for a while now and I have no preference, they are both audio, and I can make music with both! I'm happy with both.

  7. 25-02-2015  #7

    Artist

    Credits
    1
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    london
    Posts
    3
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    As the last post, and you can manipulate sound in so many different ways these days it makes little difference aurally. The main difference is price usually...

  8. 16-03-2015  #8

    Artist

    Credits
    27
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    When recording guitar tracks I always record a digital and an analog track at the same time. For some reason I always end up being able to get a better mastered track when I use the analog tracks only.

  9. 04-04-2015  #9

    Runner

    Credits
    5
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    England
    Posts
    21
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6
    Thanked in
    3 Posts
    Analogue all the way.

  10. 11-04-2015  #10

    Artist

    Credits
    1
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    5
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    0
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    0
    Thanked in
    0 Posts
    Long live analog.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •